Newspaper WordPress Theme

HOMEOPATHY

PHILOSOPHY: HOMEOPATHY
Kent [1849-1916], they rejected the outer physical aspects of disease as being the true realm of disease causation, believing the organism to possess an inner ‘spiritual body’ or ‘vital force’ – “…Van Helmont’s Archeus, Stahl’s Animal Soul…” [Lesser Writings, 1808, 490; Haehl, I, 284] – that heals and coordinates during health, but which also harbours the root causes of sickness, and what van Helmont called “…exogenous agents…that irritate the Archeus…” [Pagel, 428]. In the Organon, when writing about the vital force, Hahnemann even “uses phrases that might have been Stahl’s own,” [Haehl, I, 284].
Unlike Sydenham, van Helmont correctly interpreted Paracelsus that contagion occurred by a “spiritual Gas,” [Pagel, 1946, 436] that invades the Archeus and so creates sickness. Contagion had always been viewed as a spiritual process and never physical. These ideas also resurfaced with homeopaths like Kent, who denounced “the bacteria doctrine,” and “the molecular theory,” in favour of a position of unbridled vitalism, declaring that “We do not take disease through our bodies but through the Vital Force,” [Kent, Lesser Writings, 1926].

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Subscribe Today

GET EXCLUSIVE FULL ACCESS TO PREMIUM CONTENT

SUPPORT HOMEOPATHIC RESEARCH THAT MATTERS

EXPERT ANALYSIS OF AND EMERGING TRENDS IN HOMEOPATHY AND WELLNESS

Educative Homeopathic VIDEO WEBINARS

Get unlimited access to our EXCLUSIVE Content and our archive of subscriber stories.

Exclusive content

Newspaper WordPress Theme

Latest article

More article

Newspaper WordPress Theme