Hahnemann states the highest ideal of a cure which is the rapid, gentle and permanent restoration of health or removal of disease in its whole
extent in the shortest, most reliable and harmless way.

Let us consider what we mean by a cure. The physician who has not been trained in homoeopathic philosophy answers that a cure consists of the disappearance of the pathological state. Does it?

We believe not. For instance, does the removal of haemorrhoids constitute a cure of the patient? If so, why do so large a percentage of operated cases return?

Does the removal of the carcinoma of breast cure the patient? If so, why do they return so frequently?

Does the removal of eruptions on the skin constitute a cure? If so, why are they followed by various internal disorders which local measures
fail to relieve? No these are not cures.

They are simply the removal of the visible symptom and one symptom does not make a picture of the diseased patient. We must go back of this manifest symptom to the totality of this patient’s symptoms and take these into consideration when making our prescription, and restore to health
by removing these symptoms; then the external manifestations will disappear. There should always be an inward improvement when an external’ symptom has been made to disappear. If the removal of symptoms is not followed by restoration to health it cannot be called a cure.

Excerpt from Glen I Bidwell, How to use the repertory.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.