WHEN PURE SCIENCE USES THE WORD “HOMEOPATHIC”

Research

We stumbled upon this research paper which got us all excited. This research paper although has nothing to do with Homeopathy, has everything to do with Homeopathy. The research paper will be showcased on Sunday. Stay tuned

Here is a set of pure chemistry researchers who have found that nano particles of catalyts work in highly diluted conditions, and this condition they have termed “HOMEOPATHIC”. They went one step further. They diluted the catalyst further and although they could not measure the dilution, they were amazed to find that the reaction continued, which would normally stop without the presence of the catalyst.

Drawing allegory to this, we can proudly say that although science has not advanced to the level of detecting particles that are beyond the avogadro number, it does ot preclude the fact that such a state of the molecule does not exist.

Yet we see the miracles of homeopathy working everyday.

History also teaches us that when someone made a discovery that people could not comprehend, the people critisied his idea. But many years later, when pure science did progress, the discovery is proved.

“When a true genius appears in this world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.” – Jonathan Swift

Below is a list of scientists who were reviled for their crackpottery, only to be later proven correct.

Arrhenius (ion chemistry)
Alfven, Hans (galaxy-scale plasma dynamics)
Baird, John L. (television camera)
Bakker, Robert (fast, warm-blooded dinosaurs)
Bardeen & Brattain (transistor)
Bretz J Harlen (ice age geology)
Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan (black holes in 1930)
Chladni, Ernst (meteorites in 1800)
Crick & Watson (DNA)
Doppler (optical Doppler effect)
Folk, Robert L. (existence and importance of nanobacteria)
Galvani (bioelectricity)
Harvey, William (circulation of blood, 1628)
Krebs (ATP energy, Krebs cycle)
Galileo (supported the Copernican viewpoint)
Gauss, Karl F. (nonEuclidean geometery)
Binning/Roher/Gimzewski (scanning-tunneling microscope)
Goddard, Robert (rocket-powered space ships)
Goethe (Land color theory)
Gold, Thomas (deep non-biological petroleum deposits)
Gold, Thomas (deep mine bacteria)
Lister, J (sterilizing)
Lovelock, James (Gaia theory)
Maiman, T (Laser)
“Concepts which have proved useful for ordering things easily assume so great an authority over us, that we forget their terrestrial origin and accept them as unalterable facts. They then become labeled as ‘conceptual necessities,’ etc. The road of scientific progress is frequently blocked for long periods by such errors.” – Einstein
Margulis, Lynn (endosymbiotic organelles)
Mayer, Julius R. (The Law of Conservation of Energy)
Marshall, B (ulcers caused by bacteria, helicobacter pylori)
McClintlock, Barbara (mobile genetic elements, “jumping genes”, transposons)
Newlands, J. (pre-Mendeleev periodic table)
Nott, J. C. (mosquitos xmit Yellow Fever)
Nottebohm, F. (neurogenesis: brains can grow neurons)
Ohm, George S. (Ohm’s Law)
Ovshinsky, Stanford R. (amorphous semiconductor devices)
Parker, Eugene (existence of a ‘solar wind’)
Pasteur, Louis (germ theory of disease)
Prusiner, Stanley (existence of prions, 1982)
Rous, Peyton (viruses cause cancer)
Semmelweis, I. (surgeons wash hands, puerperal fever )
Shechtman, Dan (quasicrystals)
Steen-McIntyre, Virginia (southwest US indians villiage , 300,000BC)
Tesla, Nikola (Earth electrical resonance, “Schumann” resonance)
Tesla, Nikola (brushless AC motor)
J H van’t Hoff (molecules are 3D)
Warren, Warren S (flaw in MRI theory)
Wegener, Alfred (continental drift)
Wright, Wilbur & Orville (flying machines)
Zwicky, Fritz (existence of dark matter, 1933)
Zweig, George (quark theory)

Comments

comments

9 COMMENTS

  1. Like ur post and love to h6eo paithy , because i m not degree holder ,but i have gave many poor people medicine and they gate relaxe from homeo medicine so i have fully trust ,and faith

  2. in the pioneer museum in Eugene, OR, in the covered wagon display is a doctor kit and inside are homeopathic remedies.

  3. Actually should read, ‘when pure science uses the the word ‘homeopathic’ incorrectly’.

  4. Many scientists have confirmed Homoeopathy’s validity, but their works threaten a well established and financially powerful monster that is so insecure like “Surukuku Bushmaster”, that it cannot tolerate anything around itself.

  5. I just ignore it: i am tired of trying to explain something that they are not ready to listen to .

  6. The same way they say immunizations when they refer to their vaccines…which are nothing like vaccines. Vaccines do not immunize. They also practice the method likes cures likes, however they take out the active ingredient & replace it with man made & that stuffs that too…clearly where the side effects come from. Not to mention the damge they do.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here